Trust center

How Rooted Reality reviews posture signals

Public-source posture estimateNot legal adviceRubric reviewed2026-05-06 · 6 May 2026

Our methodology is designed to help parents understand visible signals across digital surfaces. We use public disclosures, documented product changes, reviewed evidence, and admin approval before publishing updates.

Rubric v1.2Spec locked 2026-05-06Posture axes 4Source kinds 7Review depths 4Confidence 3 bands

Trust and limits

Rooted Reality publishes public-source posture records. We use cited public sources, admin review, and a consistent methodology. We do not make legal conclusions or claims based on private household data.

We are

  • A family-facing reference library.
  • A posture-signal index based on public disclosures and documented changes.
  • A decision-support tool for parents of kids and teens 6-17.
  • A way to compare visible moderation, privacy, security, and youth-protection signals across similar surfaces.

We are not

  • A company ranking site.
  • A productivity or feature review site.
  • A certification program.
  • A substitute for reading terms, privacy policies, or household judgment.
  • A guarantee that a surface will behave the same way for every child, setting, account type, or version.
  • We use public sources only for web records.
  • Household data never reaches rootedreality.com.
  • Nothing auto-publishes.
  • Every posture record goes through review.
  • We describe signals, posture, confidence, and limits.
  • We do not provide legal advice.
  • We welcome official-source corrections.

Agents may draft posture updates. Admin approval is required before publication.

  1. input

    Public sources

  2. agent

    Agent drafts

  3. human

    Admin reviews

  4. output

    Published

What we review

Rooted Reality reviews digital surfaces — apps, communities, AI products, and model versions — that families with kids and teens may need to understand. The unit of review is a surface or a release, not a company. A company can ship multiple surfaces, and a surface can change posture between versions; the library tracks each one separately.

What we measure

Rooted Reality uses a signals-based methodology. We review what a digital surface publicly says, what it documents, and what changes over time. Scores summarize visible posture across four axes: moderation, privacy, security, and youth protection. Each score includes evidence and confidence so parents can understand both the signal and its limits.

Moderation

What we measure

How the surface handles content rules, abuse reports, and harmful behavior at scale.

How we review

We read public policies, transparency reports, abuse-handling disclosures, and documented behavior changes that affect what kids see.

Privacy

What we measure

What personal information the surface collects, how it is used, and who it is shared with.

How we review

We read privacy policies, data-handling disclosures, app-store privacy labels, and documented changes to data sharing or retention.

Security

What we measure

How the surface protects accounts, devices, and stored data from compromise.

How we review

We read public security disclosures, breach history, account-protection documentation, and changes that affect stored content or session integrity.

Youth protection

What we measure

Whether the surface ships specific protections for kids and teens out of the box.

How we review

We read youth-specific policies, age-band defaults, parental-tooling documentation, and changes that affect age-appropriate behavior.

What the scores mean

  • Each posture score is a 0-100 summary of the visible signal for one axis on one surface.
  • Scores summarize public posture; they are not final judgments and do not certify that a surface will behave the same way for every household.
  • Confidence indicates how much evidence supports the current summary — High, Medium, or Limited.

Evidence standards

Every published posture summary cites public sources. The kinds of sources we accept are listed below. Each kind carries a different weight depending on the axis it supports.

Source kinds we accept

  • Official release noteVendor-published release notes describing changes in a specific product version.
  • Official policyVendor-published policies — community guidelines, acceptable-use rules, or moderation policies.
  • Official privacy disclosureVendor-published privacy policies, data-handling disclosures, or app-store privacy labels.
  • Official security disclosureVendor-published security disclosures, breach notifications, or account-protection documentation.
  • Official help centerVendor-maintained help center articles that document defaults, settings, or youth-specific behavior.
  • Third-party reportReports from independent researchers, academic groups, or established industry transparency efforts.
  • Other public sourceOther public sources used as supporting context — never as the only source for a score change.

Minimum-source rule

A posture summary requires at least one official vendor source per scored axis. Score changes additionally require either a second independent source or a documented release event the vendor published itself.

Confidence ladder

Confidence

High

Multiple official sources cover every scored axis, and the most recent review window includes documented changes from the vendor.

Confidence

Medium

At least one official source per scored axis, but coverage is incomplete or one or more axes rest on a single source.

Confidence

Limited

Public evidence is sparse on one or more axes, or the most recent vendor disclosure predates the current review window. Treat the page as a starting summary rather than a settled posture.

How we set law confidence

The confidence label on a state's law card reflects how settled the law itself is — not how clean the most recent agent verification run was. We split those signals intentionally: the agent's run-time verification confidence (e.g. “robots.txt blocked the source on this pass”) is a useful internal diagnostic, but it’s misleading on the public surface. A state can have a fully-enacted statute and still produce a low run-confidence if a single source URL was temporarily unreachable; that is not a meaningful signal for a parent reading the card.

Three buckets, derived from three signals

We derive the public confidence from the parent-facing law status, the enforcement state, and whether the entry has a cited source URL.

Confidence

High confidence.

Specific rule in effect + active (or not-yet-effective) enforcement + at least one cited public source. The statute is on the books and we can point at it.

Confidence

Medium confidence.

Limited or adjacent coverage, in motion (a bill is moving), no state-level rule found, OR a specific rule whose enforcement is currently paused by court order. The signal is real but the picture is unsettled.

Confidence

Low confidence.

No data — Rooted Reality has not yet reviewed this state on this topic. The card should be read as “we don’t know,” not as a finding.

We do not show a numeric percentage. We don’t have a continuous confidence model under the hood, and a number like “87%” would imply precision the rubric doesn’t actually carry. The bucket plus the source link plus the analyst notes are the honest surface. If a state’s confidence reading looks wrong against the evidence, the fix is on us — flag it through the contact link in the page footer.

Review depth

Rooted Reality runs four levels of review depth depending on how much a surface has changed since the last published version. Every level ends in admin approval before anything publishes.

  • Quick

    Pre-flow review
    When
    A surface has been added to the library but has not yet had a full posture pass. Used for new entries and library cleanup.
    What
    An agent gathers basic public sources and proposes a placeholder posture pending a deeper review.
  • Standard

    Pre-flow review
    When
    Routine refresh on an existing surface where no major release or policy change is known.
    What
    An agent re-reads the existing public sources, checks for new disclosures, and surfaces any drift in axis-level signals.
  • Version-diff (behavior-diff review)

    DELTA_CHECK
    When
    A new version of an existing surface ships, and the changes are not age-, privacy-, security-, or moderation-relevant.
    What
    An agent compares the new version to the prior version and proposes a behavior-diff draft. The result maps to the DELTA_CHECK review mode in the admin queue.
  • Full re-score

    FULL_REVIEW
    When
    A new version introduces age-, privacy-, security-, or moderation-relevant changes, or a behavior-diff review surfaces a substantial change. Also used after a major policy update on an existing surface.
    What
    An agent re-scores all four posture axes against fresh evidence and proposes a full draft. The result maps to the FULL_REVIEW review mode in the admin queue.

Agents may draft posture updates. Admin approval is required before publication.

Human review

Every posture update goes through the admin queue. An admin reads the agent's proposed scores, the behavior-diff or re-score notes, and the cited evidence before the draft is published or returned for rework. A draft that an admin does not publish never appears on a public page.

Version updates

Major version releases default to a full re-score. Minor releases default to a behavior-diff review and escalate to a full re-score when the diff surfaces age-, privacy-, security-, or moderation-relevant changes. Version pages document which review depth was used and why.

Limits, independence & site privacy

Limits

Rooted Reality reviews what a surface publicly says and what we can document from outside its internal systems. We do not assess internal compliance programs, undisclosed safeguards, or behavior beyond publicly documented evidence. Posture can change between reviews, and individual households may experience the same surface differently depending on settings, account type, or version.

Independence and conflicts

Rooted Reality does not sell placement in the Apps Reference Library. Reviewed entities do not approve or edit our posture summaries before publication. If Rooted Reality has a material relationship with an entity covered in the library, that relationship should be disclosed on the relevant page.

Privacy posture of this site

Public library pages are designed to be privacy-respecting. Rooted Reality does not use third-party analytics on these public reference surfaces.

How to read a page

  1. Start with the four-axis posture snapshot to see where public signals are stronger and where they are limited.
  2. Read the confidence label next to each score; a Limited label means the signal rests on a thin evidence base.
  3. Open the evidence list to see which public sources the score is built on and when each one was reviewed.
  4. Check the version page when one is linked — posture for a specific release can differ from the product overall.
  5. Use the page as a decision aid for your household, not a final judgment about the surface.

Get methodology updates

Notified when our scoring rubric, evidence rules, or review depth changes. One email per change.