Where the law has caught up — and where it hasn't.
Every U.S. state, mapped against the topics moving fastest at the legislature. Click any state for the law and where enforcement actually stands.
- AlabamaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- AlaskaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- ArizonaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- ArkansasNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- CaliforniaNo data.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- ColoradoSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- ConnecticutIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- DelawareSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- District of ColumbiaNo data.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- FloridaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- GeorgiaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- HawaiiIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- IdahoLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- IllinoisIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- IndianaNo data.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- IowaIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- KansasNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- KentuckyLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- LouisianaNo data.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MaineNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MarylandIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MassachusettsIn motion.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MichiganSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MinnesotaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MississippiSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MissouriNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- MontanaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- NebraskaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- NevadaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- New HampshireNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- New JerseySpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- New MexicoSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- New YorkNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- North CarolinaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- North DakotaLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- OhioNo data.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- OklahomaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- OregonLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- PennsylvaniaSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- Rhode IslandNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- South CarolinaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- South DakotaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- TennesseeNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- TexasLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- UtahSpecific rule in effect.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- VermontNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- VirginiaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- WashingtonLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- West VirginiaNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- WisconsinLimited or adjacent coverage.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
- WyomingNo state-level rule found.
Reviewed 2026-05-08 · 8 May 2026
Deepfakes
Alabama
Notify me when Alabama's Deepfakes posture changes
We'll email when Alabama's Deepfakes record changes. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Sources
Why this status
Alabama HB 172 has been on the books since October 1, 2024. The law makes it a crime to knowingly distribute AI-generated media that falsely depicts a real person in the 90 days before an election with intent to harm a candidate's reputation or deceive voters. A clear AI-manipulated label is treated as a recognized defense.
What this means
- The rule is squarely about election deception in the final 90-day window — it doesn't reach AI-generated content in everyday family or school contexts, and it isn't about deepfakes of private individuals outside that window.
- The Attorney General, the depicted person, the candidate, and recognized voter-interest groups can ask a court to stop distribution — that civil-injunction path runs in parallel with the criminal offense.
- If the media carries a clear, on-the-content disclaimer that it is AI-manipulated, that single label is what shifts a piece from likely-prohibited to likely-protected.
What to verify next
- Read HB 172 (2024) directly on the Alabama Legislature's enrolled-bill page if you want to see the exact 90-day window definition and the disclaimer carve-out.
- If you're concerned about a deepfake outside an election context, Alabama HB 172 isn't the relevant rule — federal intimate-image and fraud protections, plus the platform's own content policy, are where to look.